首页> 外文OA文献 >Thresholds for Arterial Wall Inflammation Quantified by (18)F-FDG PET Imaging: Implications for Vascular Interventional Studies
【2h】

Thresholds for Arterial Wall Inflammation Quantified by (18)F-FDG PET Imaging: Implications for Vascular Interventional Studies

机译:(18)F-FDG PET成像量化的动脉壁炎症阈值:对血管介入研究的意义

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study assessed 5 frequently applied arterial (18)fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) uptake metrics in healthy control subjects, those with risk factors and patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD), to derive uptake thresholds in each subject group. Additionally, we tested the reproducibility of these measures and produced recommended sample sizes for interventional drug studies. (18)F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET) can identify plaque inflammation as a surrogate endpoint for vascular interventional drug trials. However, an overview of (18)F-FDG uptake metrics, threshold values, and reproducibility in healthy compared with diseased subjects is not available. (18)F-FDG PET/CT of the carotid arteries and ascending aorta was performed in 83 subjects (61 ± 8 years) comprising 3 groups: 25 healthy controls, 23 patients at increased CVD risk, and 35 patients with known CVD. We quantified (18)F-FDG uptake across the whole artery, the most-diseased segment, and within all active segments over several pre-defined cutoffs. We report these data with and without background corrections. Finally, we determined measurement reproducibility and recommended sample sizes for future drug studies based on these results. All (18)F-FDG uptake metrics were significantly different between healthy and diseased subjects for both the carotids and aorta. Thresholds of physiological (18)F-FDG uptake were derived from healthy controls using the 90th percentile of their target to background ratio (TBR) value (TBRmax); whole artery TBRmax is 1.84 for the carotids and 2.68 in the aorta. These were exceeded by >52% of risk factor patients and >67% of CVD patients. Reproducibility was excellent in all study groups (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.95). Using carotid TBRmax as a primary endpoint resulted in sample size estimates approximately 20% lower than aorta. We report thresholds for physiological (18)F-FDG uptake in the arterial wall in healthy subjects, which are exceeded by the majority of CVD patients. This remains true, independent of readout vessel, signal quantification method, or the use of background correction. We also confirm the high reproducibility of (18)F-FDG PET measures of inflammation. Nevertheless, because of overlap between subject categories and the relatively small population studied, these data have limited generalizability until substantiated in larger, prospective event-driven studies. (Vascular Inflammation in Patients at Risk for Atherosclerotic Disease; NTR5006)
机译:这项研究评估了健康对照受试者,具有风险因素的受试者和患有心血管疾病(CVD)的受试者中5种常用的动脉(18)氟脱氧葡萄糖((18)F-FDG)摄取指标,以得出每个受试者组的摄取阈值。此外,我们测试了这些措施的可重复性,并为介入药物研究提供了建议的样本量。 (18)F-FDG正电子发射断层扫描(PET)可以将斑块炎症鉴定为血管介入药物试验的替代终点。但是,尚无关于患病受试者健康状况下(18)F-FDG摄取指标,阈值和可重复性的概述。 (18)颈动脉和升主动脉的F-FDG PET / CT在83位受试者(61±8岁)中进行,包括3组:25名健康对照组,23名CVD风险增加的患者和35名已知CVD的患者。我们在整个预先定义的临界值范围内,量化了整个动脉,最恶心的节段以及所有活动节段中的(18)F-FDG吸收。我们报告有无背景校正的这些数据。最后,我们根据这些结果确定了测量的可重复性,并建议用于未来药物研究的样本量。在健康和患病受试者中,对于颈动脉和主动脉,所有(18)F-FDG摄取指标均存在显着差异。生理(18)F-FDG摄取的阈值来自健康对照,使用的是其目标与背景之比(TBR)值(TBRmax)的第90个百分点;颈动脉全动脉TBRmax为1.84,主动脉为2.68。超过52%的危险因素患者和67%的CVD患者超过了这些。在所有研究组中,重复性都非常好(类内相关系数> 0.95)。使用颈动脉TBRmax作为主要终点,导致样本量估计比主动脉低约20%。我们报告了健康受试者动脉壁中生理(18)F-FDG摄取的阈值,大多数CVD患者都超过了这一阈值。无论读数容器,信号量化方法或背景校正的使用如何,这都是正确的。我们还确认了(18)F-FDG PET炎症测量的高重复性。但是,由于主题类别和所研究的相对较小的人群之间存在重叠,因此这些数据的可推广性有限,直到在较大的,前瞻性的事件驱动研究中得到证实。 (有动脉粥样硬化病风险的患者的血管炎症; NTR5006)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号